What is the problem? & Why are we solving it?

ShapeShift would like to have better 1inch rates (without KYB) as well as stay up-to-date with new DEX and aggregator swap offerings to continue to offer our users the best swapping experience (focus on the UI).

How does it help Shapeshift users or DAO?

Users will get exposure to a wider array of rates across more assets, allowing them to do more with their crypto (and ideally generate fees to fund the DAO). Also would allow swaps into new chains that might be supported in the future for ShapeShift (Maya)

How are we solving it?

One option is Expand.Network that offers additional swap routing aggregation.

What are the requirements (engineering, marketing, grants etc.)?

Needs engineering lift

Needs product evaluation on how this would fit in there.

Most importantly would need to have our nodes working well and settled (so we aren’t paying for those as much before we evaluate additional API’s).

What are the risks and how will we mitigate them?

Does this effect EOA wallets, UTXO wallets, Smart Contract Wallets, Hardware wallets, or a limited scope of them?

all wallets that interface with app.shapeshift.com

Does this cross multiple blockchains?

yes.

Does this require complex signatures?

unsure

Technical due diligence

<aside> 💡 Articulate how & what technical due diligence was completed. Or what technical blockers were communicated to a partner and when they were resolved.

</aside>

Expand Client Deck Jan 2023.pdf

expand.network - All Read and Write Endpoints - as of Jan 2 2024.pdf

What are the costs associated with this?

How do we know it works? (Success/Failure Criteria)